MARK ROTHKOColor waves enter one into the other, their crests gleaming.Just as flowers cannot be harmful,So are the colors we see around us.Life grows from the depths,With associative motifs.... But sometimes it seems – frighteningAre the prospects that li ❯❯❯
Its embarrassing to call this a painting, and the person who created it an artist. A mentally ill person is drawing, while other idiots are buying it. ❯❯❯
Too good for modern times. Its so mysterious and beautiful that we are not worthy of it (as evidenced by the hateful comments from those who dislike art).
I wont exaggerate... but I agree with the statement made by the user below with the pseudonym еее... Its just a mess, and theres nothing beautiful, wonderful, or captivating about it! I wonder what or who could be inspired by... just a red-orange blotch on the wall?!
Simon, Maria, and others: Ive seen work by artists more outstanding than Rothko – it was Aristophanes in the movie Mimino! Its clear that some people have a simplistic taste and prefer Rembrandt, Velázquez, Renoir, Serov, or Levitan and Aivazovsky. But then there are people with sophisticated tastes who can appreciate Rothko, Malevich, and similar artists.
A person worked and received a fee, so theres nothing to discuss. If you do nothing, you get nothing. He doesnt just work; he actually earns money. Thats all there is to it. Theres no arguing about taste.
The depth of color touches the soul. His paintings are like the feeling of touching the sea or velvet against your skin. They can be chillingly cold, or impossibly tender. Not everyone is capable of perceiving this. But that doesnt stop the sea from being the sea. And Mark Rothko was one of the most profound in his understanding of the sensitive aspects of human nature.
COMMENTS: 15 Ответы
дерьмо
This is not for primitive tastes.
Too good for modern times. Its so mysterious and beautiful that we are not worthy of it (as evidenced by the hateful comments from those who dislike art).
I wont exaggerate... but I agree with the statement made by the user below with the pseudonym еее... Its just a mess, and theres nothing beautiful, wonderful, or captivating about it! I wonder what or who could be inspired by... just a red-orange blotch on the wall?!
In 1853, Karl Rosenkranz (German), concluded that the Sublime is the awe of the beautiful, with which I fully agree.
Simon, Maria, and others: Ive seen work by artists more outstanding than Rothko – it was Aristophanes in the movie Mimino! Its clear that some people have a simplistic taste and prefer Rembrandt, Velázquez, Renoir, Serov, or Levitan and Aivazovsky. But then there are people with sophisticated tastes who can appreciate Rothko, Malevich, and similar artists.
A person worked and received a fee, so theres nothing to discuss. If you do nothing, you get nothing. He doesnt just work; he actually earns money. Thats all there is to it. Theres no arguing about taste.
Well, if these are paintings, then my grandchildrens scribbles are simply a new word in art!
The depth of color touches the soul. His paintings are like the feeling of touching the sea or velvet against your skin. They can be chillingly cold, or impossibly tender. Not everyone is capable of perceiving this. But that doesnt stop the sea from being the sea. And Mark Rothko was one of the most profound in his understanding of the sensitive aspects of human nature.
You cannot comment Why?