Departing for the War Konstantin Savitsky (1844-1905)
Konstantin Savitsky – Departing for the War
Edit attribution
Image taken from other album: gallerix.org/s/2037947957/N/152322387/
Download full size: 1200×605 px (0,5 Mb)
Painter: Konstantin Savitsky
Location: State Russian Museum, St. Petersburg (Государственный Русский Музей).
Album navigation:
The artist Savitsky was a very prominent representative of the Association of Traveling Art Exhibitions. More than serious in its content is the famous canvas he painted, "At War." It was written only a decade after the brutal and difficult Russian-Turkish war. And the memory of those terrible events, losses and troubles was still alive in the hearts of people. The war left a painful imprint on many families.
ArtClub
Best Contemporary Atists
Description of Konstantin Savitsky’s painting "At War"
The artist Savitsky was a very prominent representative of the Association of Traveling Art Exhibitions. More than serious in its content is the famous canvas he painted, "At War." It was written only a decade after the brutal and difficult Russian-Turkish war. And the memory of those terrible events, losses and troubles was still alive in the hearts of people. The war left a painful imprint on many families. And all these events Savitsky and devoted his picture.
The plot is based on an anti-militarist work. The war is a great grief, revealing the experiences of the characters depicted in the painting. You can see that the people are divided into several groups, each expressing a different mood. But in general one feeling is felt - despair. The sadly bowed backs of women, merrily dancing young recruits are very close. Soldiers, who have seen a lot in their lives, are also depicted here, their gazes serious, one can feel the anxious tension. A train is already standing on the platform, and the gendarmes standing nearby, with their menacing appearance, as if to confirm that the parting with their relatives is already inevitable.
Despite the fact that depicted on the same canvas different in character and mood group of people, the picture looks unified. The composition seems to unite them, thereby increasing this heavy, gloomy mood of society. One senses a certain spiritual connection between the people depicted. Each to himself, but they are together, united by one great misfortune - war.
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Россия, 2020-2025 гг.
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a palpable sense of emotional upheaval. Several women are depicted in moments of intense grief; one collapses into her partner’s arms, overcome by sorrow, while another clings desperately to a departing figure. Their traditional dress – characterized by vibrant colors and intricate patterns – contrasts with the somber mood, perhaps highlighting the disruption of established cultural norms brought about by conflict. The artist has rendered their expressions with considerable detail, conveying vulnerability and anguish through furrowed brows, downturned mouths, and tear-filled eyes.
The men are portrayed in a variety of states: some appear stoic and resolute, others display a mixture of apprehension and determination. A soldier stands on the platform steps, seemingly overseeing the proceedings, his posture suggesting authority but not necessarily reassurance. The inclusion of military equipment – a cannon positioned to the right – underscores the context of impending war.
The color palette is dominated by earthy tones – browns, grays, and ochres – which contribute to a feeling of realism and gravity. However, splashes of red in the women’s headscarves and clothing provide visual focal points and subtly allude to themes of sacrifice and passion. The light source appears to be diffused, casting soft shadows that soften the harshness of the scene while still maintaining clarity.
Beyond the immediate depiction of farewell, the painting seems to explore broader subtexts concerning national identity, duty, and the human cost of conflict. It is not merely a record of departure but an exploration of the emotional toll exacted on individuals and communities during times of war. The artist’s choice to focus on the personal drama unfolding against the backdrop of military mobilization suggests a critique of the impersonal nature of warfare and its impact on ordinary lives.