Roerich N.K. – About Kuchar (study)
1926. |Republican Art Museum. Ts Sampilov. Ulan-Ude. Russian
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist’s application of color is notable for its deliberate flatness and lack of tonal variation within each band. This contributes to an overall sense of abstraction, minimizing any illusionistic depth. Theres a starkness in the rendering; details are absent, and forms are reduced to their essential outlines. The horizon line is rigidly horizontal, reinforcing this feeling of artificiality and constructed space.
Subtly, there’s a tension between the warm tones of the foreground and sky, and the cooler hues of the middle ground. This contrast could be interpreted as representing opposing forces or emotional states. The simplified forms suggest an attempt to distill the essence of a landscape, moving beyond mere representation towards a more conceptual exploration of space and color relationships. The absence of any human presence or animal life lends a sense of isolation and quietude to the scene. It’s possible that the work explores themes of memory, loss, or the subjective experience of place, rather than aiming for a faithful depiction of reality.