Kunsthistorisches Museum – Brueghel, Pieter The Elder -- Самоубийство Саула. 1562. 34х55. Музей истории искусств Вена
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 18 Ответы
НА КАРТИНЕ ЕСТЬ ДИНАЗАВР
There are dinosaurs there, and as we know, humans cannot accurately depict what they havent seen. So, one has to wonder...?
Clay figurines of humans and dinosaurs as pets have already been found. So why not imagine them fighting?
охренеть! и правда диплодоки
Camels, not diplodocuses. In those times, when the painting was created, there were no zoos. Zoological gardens with exotic Asian and African animals existed only in a few royal courts, were considered private property, and ordinary people did not have access to them.
For camels, the necks are too long. If you zoom in four times by clicking on the image, you can clearly see that the length of the neck is more than 2 meters (if you take the human figure as a unit of measurement).
Поправка – 3 раза кликнуть
Подробности тут http://levhudoi.blogspot.co.il/2014/09/blog-post.html
The painting depicts ordinary camels, which were used in the Ottoman Empire for transporting provisions. Notice the turbans worn by the soldiers in the foreground on the mountain; the Turks had camels.
Спите жители Богдада, в Богдаде все спокойно
Верблюды ага
это у турков верблюды, а у евреев – динозавры
Никаких верблюдов не обнаружил, только кони, только люди!
это ленин
это чубайс
Actually, this isnt Peters first painting, and hes not a novice. The neck curvature of these creatures is unlike that of camels, and their body and legs are significantly larger. The theory that dinosaurs went extinct is relatively recent; they were called dragons and appear in reputable dictionaries from the 1500s to the 1800s.
We dont know ANYTHING definitively about the Middle Ages! The artist LIVED during that time; he depicted reality. We shouldnt correct him or talk about motivations from the Old Testament. Perhaps, the Old Testament isnt as old as we think.
Its not quite like that, Ramiz. A great many documents have been preserved, especially in Western Europe. And the time of Pieter Bruegel the Elder is no longer the Middle Ages; its already the Early Modern period, and in art, its the era of Mannerism.
The dimensions of the painting are listed as 34x55 – are these centimeters or inches? Wikipedia says theyre in centimeters, but I dont understand how he could have painted such small details without using a magnifying glass. Can you estimate the actual size? If its in inches, that would make sense.
You cannot comment Why?
The landscape itself is rendered with meticulous detail, characteristic of Northern Renaissance painting. A formidable castle perches atop a distant hill, its presence suggesting power and perhaps a sense of impending doom or judgment. The surrounding terrain is lush with vegetation – dense forests of evergreens flank the scene, while a river winds through the valley below. This natural setting, however, does not offer solace; instead, it serves as a backdrop to the unfolding human drama.
The artist’s use of perspective creates depth and draws the viewers eye into the narrative. The bridge acts as a visual pathway leading towards the castle, reinforcing the sense of distance and scale. The muted color palette – dominated by earthy greens, browns, and grays – contributes to the somber mood.
Subtleties within the scene suggest layers of meaning beyond the immediate depiction of an event. The presence of the castle could symbolize authority or divine judgment overseeing human actions. The varied expressions on the faces of the onlookers hint at a complex moral landscape; are they witnesses, accomplices, or merely spectators to a tragic fate? The act occurring on the bridge – a liminal space between two realms – might represent a transition, a fall from grace, or a moment of irreversible consequence. The overall effect is one of profound melancholy and contemplation on themes of mortality, responsibility, and the weight of human action within a larger cosmic order.