На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Surrounding him is a throng of grotesque beings – hybrid creatures combining human, animal, and demonic features. These figures exhibit a range of expressions, from mocking grins to snarling aggression. Several appear to be actively tormenting or harassing the elderly man; one grasps his arm with an almost predatory grip, while others leer at him with malicious intent. The artist has rendered their bodies with meticulous detail, emphasizing musculature and anatomical distortions that contribute to their unsettling appearance.
To the left of the central figure, another emaciated individual sits hunched over a book or tablet, seemingly oblivious to the surrounding turmoil. His posture conveys an air of detachment or scholarly preoccupation, creating a stark contrast with the active suffering depicted elsewhere in the painting.
The architectural setting is equally unsettling. The figures are confined within what appears to be a crumbling archway, beyond which lies a dark and indeterminate space. Fragments of stone and wood litter the ground, suggesting destruction and decay. A sense of oppressive weight hangs over the scene, reinforced by the low horizon line and the dense accumulation of forms.
The color palette is predominantly earthy – browns, ochres, and reds – contributing to the overall atmosphere of gloom and despair. The limited use of brighter colors serves only to highlight specific details, such as the white garments of the elderly man or the gleam in the eyes of some of the demonic figures.
Subtextually, the painting seems to explore themes of suffering, temptation, and the fragility of human existence. The presence of the monstrous figures suggests a confrontation with inner demons or external forces that threaten to overwhelm the individual. The elderly man’s passive acceptance of his fate could be interpreted as a commentary on the inevitability of hardship or the futility of resistance in the face of overwhelming adversity. The detached figure engrossed in his studies might represent an attempt at intellectual escape from the harsh realities of life, while also highlighting the potential for ignorance and indifference to the suffering of others. Overall, the work evokes a sense of psychological unease and existential dread.