Eilif Peterssen – Landscape from Meudon, France
1884. 38.5×46.5
Location: National Museum (Nationalmuseum), Stockholm.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A body of water dominates the middle ground, its surface rendered with loose brushstrokes that suggest both movement and reflection. The color palette here leans towards muted greens and grays, contributing to a sense of atmospheric distance. Across this expanse, a building – likely residential – is visible, partially obscured by foliage. Its presence hints at human habitation within this landscape, yet it remains detached and somewhat indistinct.
The foreground is characterized by the intricate scaffolding, which appears to be in a state of partial construction or disrepair. The wood’s texture is palpable; individual planks are delineated with varying degrees of detail, creating a sense of depth and complexity. This structure acts as both a visual barrier and an integral element of the composition, drawing attention to the artists engagement with industrial forms within a natural setting. To the left, a wire fence adds another layer of obstruction, further complicating the view.
The color scheme is generally subdued, dominated by earthy tones – greens, browns, grays – with occasional flashes of brighter hues in the distant foliage and building. This restrained palette contributes to an overall mood of quiet contemplation. The light appears diffuse, lacking strong directional qualities, which flattens the perspective somewhat and emphasizes the textural elements.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of enclosure and observation. The scaffolding and fence suggest a deliberate act of separation – a distancing from the landscape itself. It is as if the viewer is witnessing this scene through a constructed lens, highlighting the artist’s role as an intermediary between nature and perception. The presence of industrial elements within what appears to be a rural setting raises questions about the encroachment of human activity upon the natural world. Ultimately, the work invites reflection on the complexities of perspective, the interplay between man-made structures and organic forms, and the act of looking itself.