Angel Orcajo – #44546
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Behind this angular barrier, a landscape unfolds. The foreground is dominated by a swirling expanse of crimson-red liquid, suggesting either water or a viscous substance, its circular motion hinting at instability and potential chaos. Rising abruptly from this pool is a monolithic structure – a tiered, almost fortress-like construction rendered in shades of pink and purple. This edifice appears to be built upon an elevated plateau, further emphasizing its isolation and imposing presence. A stormy sky, painted with dramatic purples and greys, looms above the structure, contributing to a sense of foreboding.
In the lower right corner, a more conventional cityscape emerges, depicted in muted tones of grey and purple. The buildings are angular and modern, but their scale is diminished compared to the central structure, suggesting a hierarchy or power dynamic between these environments. A small vehicle, possibly an automobile, sits near the base of one building, adding a touch of mundane detail within this otherwise surreal setting.
The painting’s subtexts revolve around themes of ambition, isolation, and the potential consequences of unchecked progress. The towering structure could be interpreted as a symbol of human aspiration – perhaps representing technological advancement or political dominance – but its precarious placement on an unstable foundation suggests vulnerability and impending collapse. The crimson pool might symbolize the destructive forces that accompany such endeavors, while the cityscape represents a more grounded reality overshadowed by this monumental ambition.
The use of perspective is particularly significant. The diagonal barrier creates a sense of fragmentation and disorientation, implying a breakdown in communication or understanding between different realms of experience. It suggests a deliberate separation – perhaps a commentary on the disconnect between humanitys aspirations and its relationship with the natural world or with itself. Overall, the work evokes a feeling of unease and invites contemplation about the precariousness of human endeavors and the potential for unforeseen consequences.